The AI Productivity Lie

In partnership with

Your developers said the new feature would take two weeks. That was six weeks ago.

You're paying top dollar for senior talent, but somehow a competitor with half your team size just shipped three major updates. Your development manager keeps mentioning "process improvements," but nothing seems to get faster.

Want to know something? Your team isn't slow. They're drowning in invisible work that has nothing to do with coding.

Recent research on AI coding tools proves how badly we misunderstand developer productivity. The findings should make every CEO question what they think they know about development speed.

GitHub's research shows developers complete tasks 55% faster with AI coding assistants. Developers report feeling more productive, more satisfied, and more capable.

But a rigorous study by METR tells a different story. When experienced developers used AI tools on their own projects, they took 19% longer to complete tasks.

The perception gap is something, isn’t it? Developers predicted AI would speed them up by 24%. Even after experiencing the actual slowdown, they still believed AI had improved their productivity by 20%. But it slowed them down.

The slowdown reveals something important about how development work actually happens. AI makes typing code faster, but typing speed was never the bottleneck.

The real constraints are invisible:

• Design reviews that require three approvals

• Pull request queues that sit for days

• Test failures that block deployments

• Context switching between tools and systems

Research from multiple studies shows that experienced developers spend a large amount of time validating AI output. They accept less than 44% of AI suggestions. Three-quarters read every line of generated code. More than half make major modifications to clean up AI output.

This creates a new type of overhead: orchestrating and validating AI contributions across development workflows.

The productivity gap widens with developer experience. MIT and Harvard research across multiple companies found junior developers see the biggest gains from AI tools - up to 26% faster task completion.

Senior developers with deep knowledge of the codebase often see minimal gains or even actual slowdowns.

The reason is context.

Experienced developers rely on tacit knowledge about system architecture, coding standards, and business logic. AI tools lack this context, forcing experienced developers to spend time retrofitting AI output to fit complex requirements.

This reveals something important: the things that slow down experienced developers aren't coding problems. They're system problems. The same invisible constraints that make AI ineffective for senior developers are what actually control development speed across your entire organization.

These constraints include:

• Process friction: How many approvals does a simple change require? How long do code reviews sit in queues? What percentage of deploys fail due to environment issues?

• Context switching: Developers average switching between 10-15 different tools per day. Each switch requires mental reloading of context and goals.

• System complexity: Technical debt creates exponential drag. Simple changes require modifications across multiple systems. Features that should take days require weeks of coordination.

• Communication gaps: Requirements change mid-development. Stakeholders provide feedback late in the process. Teams work on conflicting priorities.

Most leaders can't see these bottlenecks because they happen below the surface. A feature request looks simple from the outside, but developers know the real complexity. The key is learning to identify these hidden constraints in your own organization.

The AI productivity research offers a diagnostic framework for any technology leader. If tools that make coding faster don't improve overall delivery speed, then coding speed isn't your constraint. The real constraints are hiding in your development process.

Here's how to find them:

• What percentage of development time goes to activities no tool can optimize? Code reviews, stakeholder alignment, environment troubleshooting, and requirements clarification often consume more time than actual coding.

• How many handoffs does a typical feature require? Each handoff introduces delay and potential miscommunication.

• What happens when a developer needs information from another team? Are they blocked for hours or days?

• How often do priorities change mid-sprint? Context switching destroys productivity more than any tool can restore.

These questions reveal why the AI productivity research matters beyond just AI tools. When experienced developers slow down despite faster code generation, it exposes the real issues that are slowing down development in every organization.

The companies shipping faster than their competitors aren't using better tools; they've built better systems. They eliminated the invisible work that drowns development teams. They measured what actually matters: time from idea to customer value, not lines of code per hour.

The most productive teams optimize their entire development pipeline. They reduce approval friction, minimize context switching, and invest in system architecture that supports rapid iteration.

No tool will fix a development process that requires five approvals for a one-line change. No AI assistant will speed up a team that spends half their time in status meetings. No framework will help developers who get interrupted every 20 minutes with "quick questions."

The companies shipping faster than their competitors aren't using better tools; they have built better systems. They eliminated the invisible work that drowns development teams by measuring what actually matters: time from idea to customer value, not lines of code per hour.

AI tools will continue evolving. The next productivity promise is already being pitched to your team. But the research proves that productivity gains come from removing constraints, not adding capabilities.

If you found this post helpful, consider sharing it with another executive grappling with AI, technology, and data. If you want to explore AI and other Technology strategies, grab some time on my calendar, and let's chat.

Startups who switch to Intercom can save up to $12,000/year

Startups who read beehiiv can receive a 90% discount on Intercom's AI-first customer service platform, plus Fin—the #1 AI agent for customer service—free for a full year.

That's like having a full-time human support agent at no cost.

What’s included?

• 6 Advanced Seats

• Fin Copilot for free

• 300 Fin Resolutions per month

Who’s eligible?

Intercom’s program is for high-growth, high-potential companies that are:

• Up to series A (including A)

• Currently not an Intercom customer

• Up to 15 employees

Apply now

Newsletter Recommendations